Jordan has a simple fix camera manufacturers could implement to improve their video autofocus. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. The 135mm f2 is by all accounts one of their better and more reliable lenses however I believe the chance of a defective lens is lower with the Canon. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. This way you get both lenses with only one! If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). As you'd expect from a premium prime lens, both maximum and average chromatic aberration is very low across the aperture range, with the maximum CA on the order of 0.02% of frame height regardless of aperture. Samyang 135mm F/2 ED UMC Review (Camera Labs), Does a F/2.0 lens become F/2.8 when used on a crop sensor camera? The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. It's tiny compared to almost everything else in the 85-135 range, and used properly, it can produce results that hold up to my DC (all other factors being equal such as subject distance, f-stop, lighting, etc.). AF is accurate and very fast. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. Bye This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. Light weight and robust. I put quotes around the ones that are written on the lens. 135 mm. In this configuration, the lens is still a very fast F3.4. I mainly use for head shot photography. In the middle of the OM System lineup, the OM-5 promises yesterday's top-tier performance in a lighter, more compact body. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. I'll walk you through all this inc. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. Im so new to all of this so thank you for your insightful and educational posts. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. In photoshop I love to zoom 200, 300 and even 400% to see the extreme details it is an absolutely amazing lens, great backround blur, great for low light weddings with available light. Light falloff (vignetting) gets pretty high (0.73 EV wide open, but drops to 0.3 EV at f/2.8, and only 0.17 EV at f/4. It disagrees completely with the definition that you give! Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. I agree to some extent with many of the critics of the article and disagree with much of its content, but I also have respect for the the author's right to express those opinions. In the right hands this lens really does have "magic pixie dust", as a friend once described. They are by nature designed to compromise by magnification and distance, and are therefore not optically optimized at any single setting. My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! I got this lens because of portraiture. I bought it for its bokeh. Released only weeks apart, the Sony 50mm F1.4 GM and Sigma F1.4 DG DN Art are clear competitors. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. See the full-size version on Astrobin. The lens has 14 stops when turning the aperture. The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. @juksu - you're such a liar. And only the cat photo has something OK (but it is a cat shot You easily get them look good). Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. never mind.. confirmed from others that F19 is indeed the one that is excluded on this lens! The first example is good to show that you can take photos of persons in front of an ugly background without completely ruining the shot (important for people shooting events), the last one is the only one I really like (because of the color) but you could shoot this with any lens with short MFD. Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. The downsides of this configuration are that shooting wide open can make focusing difficult. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. But when holes in text prompt me to look at the work of the writer, there is nothing professional there either. Preaching to the choir! It's Film Friday, so let's take a look back at the film format that gave APS-C sensors their name! Focal length: 135mm Maximum aperture: f/2.0 Lens construction: 10 elements in 8 groups Angle of view: 18 degrees Closest focusing distance: 3 feet Focus adjustment: Rear focusing system with USM Mount: Canon Filter size: 72mm Dimensions: 3.2 inches in diameter and 4.4 inches long Weight: 1.7 pounds Warranty: 1 year See more (For Nikon users there's the new 105mm too.). However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. Fast. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 I find 400gm as the tolerable weight limit for a lens on my panasonic gx85, and I am guessing following telephoto lenses would satisfy the itch to get good bokeh shots, 1. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. Thanks & Cheers Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. Not rude at all, a fair comment. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! On the 135/2 all you've got is the bare metal. Large focus ring. Could use a few updates. As the reader reviews below testify, this is an absolutely stellar lens, probably one of the sharpest and most distortion-free that Canon makes. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. This is a fully manual lens, meaning that it does not have autofocus, and you must manually select the f-stop . You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. Add To Cart. Rudy, why didn t you include any L lenses from canon? Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) [emailprotected]. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. https://www.dpreview.com/news/7777572944/video-using-the-5-700-canon-200mm-f2-on-the-new-sony-a7r-iii, DPReview TV: We share our 2021 predictions while freezing our asses off, Video: Here's how Adobe Lightroom Mobile works on the Zeiss ZX1, DPReview TV: How to set up Sony's 'Real-Time' autofocus tracking, 7Artisans releases a $195 35mm F5.6 golden pancake lens for Leica M mount cameras, OM System M. Zuiko 90mm F3.5 Macro Sample Gallery, Fujifilm X-T5 production sample gallery (DPReview TV), DPReview TV: Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM Review, DPReview TV: Sony 50mm F1.4 GM vs Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN Art, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. Just place your subject against a distant background, and half of the job is done. Aperture ring. Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. This creates an effective focal length of roughly 200mm, a useful magnification for a wide variety of astro-imaging scenarios. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. Optics quality, sharp,very special picture, sharpness, clarity, weight, fast, accurate AF (fringe benefit of f/2), price, no IS, makes you regret buying any zoom lenses, compact, very sharp wide open, good color contrast, bokeh, this is the lens. So there - it is not a perfect object. The only downside with that lens is that it is manual focus, which might not be suitable for photographing sports or children. (purchased for $899), reviewed March 19th, 2012 Add To Cart. It really is about talent, creativity, and vision, not gear. It is good to know that the 200/4 SMC Takumar is good. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. During the frigid months of winter, my motivation to spend over an hour setting up my complete deep-sky imaging rig dwindles. With a rounded 9-blade diaphragm, shallow depth of field imaging will be rendered with pleasing out-of-focus highlights. But like a glitch in the matrix, an anomaly that shouldn't exist, you can get the Samyang/Rokinon 135mm for as little as $430 brand new. Crazy fast AF! Of the 150 images I considered fit to publish, only 4 were made with the 135. I have a vintage Nikon135mm f/2.8 AI-s which produces virtually the same bokeh and weighs a quarter of this or any other 135mm AF lens. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. It's terrible. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. The interest of a f/1.4 is to be able to be perfect at f/2.8, while a f/1.8 or f/2 might need to be on f/4 to have the same sharpeness and overall IQ.They are not meant to be used wide open, except in rare moments. 2 Dielectric Diagonals. Equipment used was an astromodified Canon 700D, Samyang 135mm f2, SkyTech Triband filter, Star Adventurer 2i, ZWO mini finder with ASI120MM, guiding with PHD2 and polar alignment using sharpcap. Let's unbox, review and test this lens to find out why it is one of the best bang for your buck deals in astrophotography! The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. In between interviews with executives of the major companies, Dale Baskin took to the show floor to bring you this report. Trully sharp accross whole frame from f2 on 5d. If so, which one? The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. 645 lenses such as the mamiya apo line and pentax edif can operate within these conditions without vignetting on apsc sensors. This lens has only two drawbacks. The 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens from Samyang is a manual focus telephoto prime lens useful for portraiture and most telephoto applications. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. The criterion I used in evaluating lenses was optical perfection with no reservations. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. I wanted to add my experience with some lenses that I thought worthy of being considered too, and some of the equipment that I have used. Images that sing. I owned this lens for a long time, then traded it for the 70-200 2.8IS II. Because it's an L-series lens by Canon, you can be sure that the image quality and performance of the 24-105mm meet the demanding aspects of astrophotography such as focus and star quality. What is it like shooting with one today? Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. When I was on my way home after purchasing my first 135mm lens (the Samyang/Rokinon one) I took a few quick snapshots just to try out the lens. When all that was available were APS-C crop cameras a 85mm lens provided a near equivalent view angle to the 135mm on a full frame camera. With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. Excellent build quality, fast auto focus, and its fast. Yes there's bokeh. Write your own user review for this lens. Any good ones apart from the Big Boys. Will I be able to capture the heart nebula with the lens youre talking about or would I need to modify my camera as well? What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms. With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect. Focal length is great. In my test, nikon have the same color correction than Canon and same sharpness. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . The lens is available on eBay for around $200. The Nikon D810A, however, is modified for astrophotography out of the box. Also type the lens you are interested in into the search window on Astrobin to see examples shot with that lens. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. That means that it doesnt require a robust equatorial telescope mount as a larger, heavier telephoto lens would. I would never shell out hundreds of euros for a 135 prime let alone one with manual focus. With the high megapixel cameras, most people are going to ideally want to shoot at 1/200 or faster. Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. Typical L construction. To me it is a dead spot between 85 and 200. I would! Its actually kind of neat to watch! Standards have risen in recent years. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. The difference between modern and old telephoto lenses is probably similar to the difference between my APO and an old Jaegers 5in F5. Deserves to be in the camera hall of fame. One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. How good this lens overall and how sharp and color-free? He loves photography, and runs a YouTube channel with tutorials, lens reviews and photography inspiration. If you own an EOS Camera - It's a no Brainer, Buy one http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". Sharp but smooth at the same time. This lens has a long focus adjustment ring, with great tension. Amazing sharpness wide open at F2.0 and the focus ring is nice and firm not tight you don't really need to tape it down for astrophotography. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. I know this is a very old article but I was re reading as I mulled over this very point (85/1.4 vs 135/1.8) and I've gotta point out this math is all wrong First off 85->135 is a 1.6x crop and a 1.6x crop will yield 16MP on 42MP bodies (42 / (1.6x1.6) ), ~20MP on the A1, and ~24MP on the A7R IV. Of course headline central sharpness is great, that is what grabs headlines, always shot at f2: any 135mm lens is going to give similar results. Built quality is wonderful, focus ring is well-damped. Wonderful, smooth bokeh. The Andromeda Galaxy using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. SIx months on from buying it this has become my favourite lens ever, beating my previous favourite (Leica's 4th version of the 35mm Summicron for its M-series rangefinders). Got it! When you shoot a 135mm F2 lens at F2, your subject will stand out in this beautiful way, often without much work needed from you as the photographer. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. Several functions may not work. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses. The second best, is the Hoya Pro One Digital MC UV(0) filter. They seem to be really good for NB work. In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. But in the rush to make hybrids why are aren't we giving video shooters the tools they need? $581.00 for 7 days. Nice image, andysea. You may need to refocus your subject as the temperature changes throughout the night. While they provide a very large flat field we noticed some CA. Great for portraits. But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. That setup will give you all that you really need. The few occasions I use a 135 FL usually are landscape shots (where I have no use for f2) and childrens playing (where I need zoom and fast af). Why so salty? Already wide open this lens produce some high quality photos. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. I thought I had to sell my 100/F2.8 macro L but thanks for letting me know I can keep it. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! This lens provides all of these requirements. If experience has taught me anything, its that the practical, pain-free equipment that gets the most use under the stars. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. Canon 60Da DSLR and Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L2 lens at 135mm, f/3.2. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. Check out There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. As it is it is earns a 9. 24/28mm, 50mm, 100mm, 200mm. I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. Fast continuous shooting, reliable autofocus and great battery life are just three of the most important factors. Thanks, This brings me to my question. My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera.
How To Get Rid Of An Incubus,
Apex Account Value Calculator,
John Besh Liver Pate,
Chris Mcdonough Son Passed Away,
Hazlehurst, Ga Police Reports,
Articles C